Team Leadership: Does Your Leadership Team Really Talk? Part 1

"body">must we achieve financially?", "what must we deliver
Businesses need teams. With the pressures to deliverfor our customers to achieve our financial goals?",
higher revenues, greater customer satisfaction,"what must we excel at operationally?", "what sort of
enhanced operational efficiency and faster speed toculture and leadership will enable our strategy?" etc.
market, success requires more than the brilliance ofTeams that regularly debate these types of questions,
any individual. But even when leadership teams consistand actively consider the causal linkages, are more
of the company's best and brightest, high-qualityable to identify where new issues need to be
teamwork at the top remains elusive for mostaddressed, and see emerging gaps in their thinking.
organisations. Why?Consequently, they react more speedily to address
Leadership teams that bring together strong individualskey strategic issues before they become really
can be the best - and the worst - of worlds. Whensignificant barriers to performance.
each individual just delivers on his or her own3. "What is our implementation plan?" Research shows
competencies, however effectively, the team is notthat effective strategy implementation remains a key
truly functional. It's the 'synergy' created betweenconcern for most CEO's3. Perhaps this is because the
talented individuals - the tapping of the collectivenitty-gritty of strategy implementation is rarely explored
potential - that lies at the heart of successful leadershipby top teams. Questions such as "which elements of
teams.our strategy require teamwork, and which don't?", and
So, what's the key to creating this synergy? We"what should be handled cross-functionally versus
believe, quite simply, it's talking that creates greatfunctionally?" are crucially important and winning teams
teamwork. What sets high-performing teams apart isrobustly debate these issues. They also seek
their ability to engage in high-quality conversations:agreement over other details, including performance
conversations which go beyond an exchange ofmeasures, resource allocation, governance and
information to those that have the power to transformdecision-making boundaries. Agreeing regular
performance.check-points to review progress, learn from
We have found that teams who engage in regular,experiences and ensure people are delivering as
quality, focused debate about their strategy, capabilitiesagreed is also vital - many teams invest too little time
and behaviours are significantly more successful thanensuring they actively reflect on and manage their
those that don't. And, we know that when teams failperformance.
to effectively discuss a course of action, widerCase Study:
business performance inevitably suffers.A leading international medical equipment company
The job of leadership is to ask and answer the rightappointed a new President for Europe to drive growth
questions. Below, we suggest the kinds of strategicin an 'underperforming' business. Shortly after his arrival
questions teams need to explore in order to create ahe called a meeting of the top team to discuss
platform of effectiveness. Many of these may appearbusiness objectives for the next three years. With a
obvious, yet experience tells us that frequent ambiguity,background of 5-6% annual profit growth the team
inconsistency and disagreement in these areas arewere given new goals nearly twice what they had
significant factors in team underperformance.been delivering. The President asked each Regional
CONVERSATIONS ABOUT PURPOSE &Director to prepare their sales and marketing strategy
STRATEGYand present this at the next management meeting.
With support functions present, and some
1. "What is our purpose?" Without doubt, a clear andre-negotiation of the details, these plans were signed
compelling purpose attracts, energises and retainsoff and the three Regional Directors asked to report
great people; without it, even excellent teamsprogress on a monthly basis. However, after 12
frequently have low levels of collective energy andmonths, growth had improved only marginally.
commitment. One piece of research2 shows that 70%Under pressure from Corporate office, the President
of executive teams lack clarity on what they areinvited a trusted former colleague to take a look at the
aiming to deliver to customers. Ironically, even thebusiness. Through a series of confidential interviews he
presence of corporate mission and value statementsdiscovered that - despite their markets being
don't always ensure this. As market conditions change,remarkably similar - one region was achieving volume
competitors reposition themselves and new threatsgrowth by 'bundling' high-margin and low-margin
and opportunities open up, questions like "what type ofproducts together, while the other two divisions were
business do we want to become?", "what do wesimply driving sales by reducing costs across the
want to achieve together" and "who do we want torange. These differences in order management and
beat?" help create shared purpose. Yet few teamsproduct batching were further impacting supply and
take the time needed to create this type of claritydistribution; providing the business with an unwanted
upfront. The implementation challenges that manyreputation for poor service. Support functions were
teams experience can frequently be traced back totherefore spending much time 'fire-fighting' customer
the need for these fundamental, ongoingand operational problems.
conversations.Facilitating a working session with the management
2. "What is our strategy?" Most senior teams taketeam the advisor was able to open up a debate on
time out each year to discuss strategy. But, often, thethe best sales and marketing strategy for the business
"talk doesn't walk". With corporate strategy documentsas a whole, together with the best approach to
frequently inches thick, and with little relationshipimplementation across manufacturing and distribution,
between functional strategies, it's no wonder thatservice, finance and HR. With alignment across all
implementation can be slow and messy. Strategy -parts of the business the team were able to move
both its management and measurement - is best builtforward in a more coordinated and united way that
on a simple model and a shared language. And, aensured customers were at the centre of their thinking.
growing body of evidence suggests that leadershipResults improved dramatically.
teams who adopt this approach outperform those thatParts 2 and 3 will discuss conversations about
don't. The most effective teams focus their strategiccapability and behaviour, and how a leader can create
conversations around a few simple questions that helpthe environment for high performance.
create an integrated approach. For example; "what