Is the World Becoming Real-Time, Continous, And Without End?

The Curmudgeon believes that, without necessary andintroduced. What is the brain to do with this massive
sufficient prior consideration, the US is starting down anew assault on a person's private space? What
technological path which may well prove to beunforeseen problems in human behavior lie ahead?
unfortunate, festooned with many unforeseenWhy weren't these possibilities considered before we
consequences. One wishes that some rationalrushed ahead with even more technology "just
consideration would have been given prior to startingbecause we can do it?"
the journey, but with most of today's consumer2. The practical liability of the possession/use of these
technology being driven almost entirely by free-marketfully-portable devices is that they divert attention from
enterprise, "whatever can be done.....will be done" asa user's local environment. If that environment happens
long as a buck can be made.to be a metropolitan street intersection, a busy
The Curmudgeon is normally a big proponent of thehighway, or even a farm tractor/combine, such
use of the electromagnetic spectrum (i.e., radio) to dodiversion carries real risks. Significant injury to an
tasks that can't easily be accomplished in other waysindividual can occur in just hundreds of milliseconds --
or, in some instances, couldn't be accomplished in anysufficient time to avoid danger if one is attentive, or to
other way. But not in this present case. There are toosuffer consequences if one is not.
many liabilities waiting to arise.Certainly not all portable devices are equally
He is speaking here of the on-going, uncritical massattention-diversive. Barcode readers, medical monitors,
public adoption of one- and two-wayRFID readers carry almost no risk at all. One-way
consumer-portable wireless devices, of which theaudio devices, such as broadcast radios, are probably
iPhone is probably the signature icon. This does NOTonly marginally risky. Slightly more risky would be some
include such specialized items as wireless medicalvisual devices, such as mobile GPS receivers. Here, at
monitors, industrial bar-code readers, mobile GPSleast, the individual can choose his (occasional) viewing
navigators, and RFID tags. These special purposeinstants. More risky are the audio two-way devices,
wireless devices, along with many other similar items,such as cell phones, that require little visual attention but
have practical virtues and carry far less risk than doesdo require mental participation in a conversation. At the
the new class of consumer-targeted devices.highest risk level, in my opinion, are the two-way visual
These radio-based portable (i.e.,devices such as mobile television and text messaging,
routinely-carried-on-the-consumer) devices arewhich foster both visual diversion and mental
intended to accomplish many contemporaryinvolvement. Some real thought should be given to
telecommunications functions that previously were theconsequences before these are made available to the
province of stationary systems. Some of these newgeneral public.
acceptances, most notably cellular telephones, have3. Massive adoption of what are, in essence, portable
advanced to the point such that the devices arebroadband wireless digital stations inevitably requires
already in nearly universal usage. Others are justmassive use of the (still) finite RF spectrum. While new
appearing on the scene: wireless Internet access,technologies generally lead to more efficient usage of
portable television receivers, text-messengers.each Hertz, there are "Tragedy of the Commons"
Now the Curmudgeon is not a technological Luddite; helimitations awaiting the complete consumption of the
well understands the engineering behind, and owns andspectrum. What is to be done in the decades to come,
uses many different pieces of electronicas new (and perhaps compelling) wireless applications
communications systems (in the broadest sense). Butare developed, only to be shelved because of
The Curmudgeon is both philosophically and practicallyunavailability of usable spectrum? Should we not
opposed to the mass consumption of the radio"save" today against tomorrow's needs? Let's use the
frequency spectrum by consumer-portable devices,RF spectrum for tasks that cannot be done any other
and in some cases strongly opposed. Since nobodyway, and use our (nearly infinite bandwidth) wire line
seems to want to present the case against them, henetworks for those that can operate quite well without
will herein present at least some of it.radio.
1. Most importantly, the granting of "instant access4. These portable wireless devices inevitably foster a
directly to the person" through these devices -- onfeeling of "self-aggrandizement" on the part of their
what can easily become a continuous 7/24users, telling all that "I can make my presence, my skills,
basis---removes the possibility of maintaining anmy expertise available anywhere, and at any time. I
individual's psychological "private space." With theseam thus an important person!" The Curmudgeon,
new devices in use there is no longer any "time out,"however, believes differently. He is not a Public Safety
any chance to stop, to process information alreadyofficer, an emergency room physician, or a Supreme
received, to consider possibilities, to plan next-steps.Court justice sitting on a convict's appeal of a capital
The world becomes real-time, continuous, and withoutexecution. There is nothing that he can do for another
end. The distinction between "work time" and "leisureperson *in real time* that carries any important
time" evaporates. Addictions (i.e., "can't turn it off!")consequences. Everything that he is able to do will not
begin, along with frustration as the individual begins tosuffer from the delay of a few minutes or a few
realize that the ceaseless incoming "data flood" canhours, or in some cases even a few days. There is
never be fully processed or mastered.almost always time to stop, to think, and to consider
Most of the communications functions that are aboutbefore action commences.
to be adopted were handled previously by fixed, wiredThis is not to deny that there are times when real-time
devices (i.e., corded telephones, desktop computers,communications are absolutely required, and these
in-home radio and television receivers) or, at most, inportable devices can do that task well. But the
very limited ways by simple portable and mobileCurmudgeon very much contends that the numbers of
devices (car broadcast radios). One usually had tosuch occasions are not nearly as large as the number
take very specific actions to use these, and if (s)heof instances when subscribers use their portable
were away from the locations of the fixed devices,devices to make themselves feel self-important, for
their use was deferred to a later time, almost alwaystasks that don't even remotely require such real-time
with very few negative consequences.usage. Perhaps the difference between real need and
All this is about to vanish in less than an eye blink onself-aggrandizement usage amounts to orders of
the time scale of human evolution. The problem is.....themagnitude.
human brain evolves very slowly; it has no precedentsSo the questions remain: What are the real costs, and
or existing adaptations for the state of "being wired-inthe real consequences, of the mass adoption of these
continuously." The brain is probably is just now comingwireless, always-on-the-consumer communications
to grips with the previous generation ofdevices? Is the Curmudgeon really the first to ask
communications devices, and even for these there hadthese questions?
been few earlier neural analogs when they wereWhat do you think?