Ethical Issues in Drug Trials and IRBs

Clinical drug trials are full of ethical issues. In moststudies free from ethical pitfalls. IRBs review protocol
cases, these trials involve experimentation on aand documents at the beginning of the study and
population of humans. The subjects are divided intothrough its duration. In many cases, they will "spot
groups - each group will receive a treatment or incheck" these documents unannounced so no additions,
some cases they may be given a placebo. The drugdeletions or other changes to the documentation can
trial tries to determine how the treatments impact theoccur.
human subjects and whether or not the drug will helpThese review boards also try to create an accurate
humans. Clearly, any time humans are involved inpicture of a drug's effects. They look for evidence of
medical research, there are a number of ethical issuespotential harms associated with the medications. IRBs
at stake.can have difficulty making these determinations when
There are a few issues that have become unique toinformation is withheld from the boards. If a researcher
the 21st Century. Currently, the World Healthdoes not share pre-existing conditions of human
Organization (WHO) works to keep trials transparentparticipants, the review board cannot be expected to
and ensures the results are published in clinicaldetermine a side effect of a drug as the reaction
registries. Another common concern is "exporting"could be related to the aforementioned pre-existing
medical research studies. Many human rightscondition. In some cases, IRBs simply are not provided
organizations are concerned the medical communitywith the information necessary to make a contextually
will reach out to poorer countries for human testcorrect judgment.
subjects. This issue is one of global justice and hasSome in the medical community have suggested three
been regulated by organizations such as the WHO.ways in which independent review boards can expand
Protecting the rights and safety of human subjects aretheir reach and further assist in the review process.
other common concerns. Independent review boardsThe first suggestion includes ensuring a monitoring plan
have been formed to answer these questions andis in place for individual study sites. If each site knows
ensure every subject understands their rights as ahow it will measure data before the study begins and
member of the drug trial. Duplication of efforts is acommunicates that plan with the review board, there
worry among these organizations. In some cases,are fewer opportunities for mistakes. This step will also
monitoring is overemphasized while other tasks, suchmake the board's job much easier during the study.
as communication with patients, are underemphasized.Next, the IRBs certify investigators to ensure they
Other problems include confusion over monitoringunderstand their compliance responsibilities.
responsibilities, lack of integration and otherInvestigators trained in subject safety, adverse
communication disconnects.reaction reporting and collecting study documents will
Monitoring groups are also tasked with keepinghelp the board gather information it needs. Finally, the
research on track. They make sure patients haveboards can review safety monitoring data to make
given informed consent, researchers have followedsure no other safeguards need to be added before
protocols, and documents dealing with unanticipatedthe trial begins. This will reduce the amount of time
events and adverse reactions are properly maintained.wasted during the trial and any ethical missteps can be
Independent review boards, IRBs, are one of theavoided early on.
groups responsible for keeping medical research