Type 2 Diabetes, Glycemic Index and Weight Loss: The Next Diet Fad?

Move over low carbohydrate, here comes the nextmore utility for research on how populations of people
craze -- the glycemic index. As attention to the Atkinseat, not for individual diet planning. One reason is
and South Beach diets wanes, watch out for the nextbecause glycemic load is based on measures of the
wave of diet books featuring the glycemic index.glycemic index, and the measures themselves are
Indeed, just googling the term shows a variety ofhighly variable according to, among other things,
books already exist that promise health benefits,individual response, where a food is grown, how ripe it
including type 2 diabetes control and the ever elusiveis, its physical form (whether it's whole or ground, for
weight loss miracle.Just how does the glycemic indexexample) and how it is prepared.For example, rice
work? Should we add another diet book to ourfrom Italy has a glycemic index of 102; in Canada, it's
already burgeoning libraries?The Glycemic Index72. Tables of glycemic index often reflect an average
Promise for Diabetes & Weight LossThe glycemicglycemic index, which can be useful for studies of
index is simply a measure of the effect awhat an entire population eats. When it gets down to
carbohydrate-containing food has on blood sugarindividuals, obviously the variations can make a big
levels. The theory - emphasis on theory; this isn'tdifference. To further complicate things, fat and protein
proven -- is that foods with a higher glycemic indexalso affect the glycemic response, resulting in a lower
cause blood sugar levels to rise more than foods withglycemic effect when a food is eaten in combination
a lower index, thereby increasing insulin secretion,with other foods rather than by itself.What to
which then causes blood sugar levels to drop.DoClearly, trying to determine the effect of a food on
Theoretically, that leads to false hunger, causing us toblood sugar outside of a laboratory is fraught with
eat more than our body really needs. Hence, strugglescomplications that would make eating a low glycemic
with weight and, for people with diabetes, blood sugardiet an exercise in frustration. That is, if you keep
control.A number of studies have looked at variouslooking at single foods. But if you look at the total diet,
aspects of this promise. For people with diabetes,there are some words of wisdom to make smart
several studies do suggest that paying attention to theeating a reality.Choose among a wide variety of whole
glycemic impact of foods may have a positive effectfoods, including whole grains, beans, vegetables, fruits,
on A1C levels (a measure of blood sugar control).lowfat dairy products and protein foods. Most likely,
Studies of the effect of the glycemic index on weightyou'll automatically be eating a lower glycemic diet as a
gain are inconsistent; some show a potential effect;result. Refined foods - those with fiber removed such
others don't. A recent study of 32 healthy 'overweight'as white bread and fruit juices - tend to have a higher
adults with normal glucose tolerance, however,glycemic load. What's more, they're lower in all the
showed that those who had high levels of insulinvitamins, minerals, phytonutrients and other substances
secretion and ate a low glycemic load diet lost thethat make for healthy eating. If you do want to eat a
most weight.The Problems with Using the Glycemicfood with a higher glycemic index, eat it in combination
Index for Weight Loss &/or Diabetes ControlThewith a protein food. For example, saltines with peanut
glycemic index, however, has a number of practicalbutter for a snack. If you have type 1 or type 2
problems. For one, it fails to truly categorize foodsdiabetes or high insulin levels, work with your dietitian to
according to their impact on glycemic effect becausedetermine if some foods have a higher glycemic
it doesn't consider the amount of a food that we tendeffect for you. This may involve checking your blood
to eat at one time. A good example of this is a carrotsugar levels after test meals.So save your money -
versus a Snickers bar.In the low carbohydrate dietskip the latest book promising easy solutions for type 2
craze, carrots gained a bad reputation due to theirdiabetes and weight loss by using the glycemic index.
glycemic index. They rank 92 on the scale, which runsFirst, it isn't easy; second, it's not necessarily accurate.
from 0 to 100. By comparison, a Snickers bar has aTry spending your money instead on something that
glycemic index of only 68. So does that meanreally helps you feel better - like a massage, facial,
Snickers are better choices than carrots for type 2manicure, pedicure, personal training session, and the
diabetes and weight loss? No. Because the amount oflike.Marsha J. Hudnall, MS, RD, CD is director of health
carbohydrate eaten at any one time is an importantcommunications and senior nutritionist at Green
factor. If you take into account how muchMountain at Fox Run. For over 34 years, Green
carbohydrate you eat in each carrot vs. each SnickersMountain at Fox Run has been a women's weight loss
bar - which is the basis for a calculation calledretreat and spa. Green Mountain's unique weight loss
glycemic load - carrots rank as 7 and Snickers as 23.program has offered women lifelong solutions for
To get as much carbohydrate from carrots as oneweight management through lifestyle and behavioral
Snickers bar, we'd have to eat about 8 carrots in onechange. Learn more about our Mastering Type 2
sitting.The concept of glycemic load, then, appears toDiabetes and Prediabetes, offered in concert with the
better to assess the effect of individual foods on bloodJoslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School.
sugar levels. Still, experts agree that this concept has